The belief in the rights of same sex marriage can be compared to the belief in the rights of having an arranged marriage. Both sets of marriage systems are based upon an individual’s belief system, usually always rooted in one’s religious background. It would be naive to expect those whose faiths do not agree with either type of marriage arrangements to change their views easily; however, it is ludicrous to think it justifiable to outlaw a type of marriage based on religious views. Arranged marriages happen in the United States within groups of South Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants who have brought this practice with them from their homelands. “We the People” do not step in and say that this is against the law to practice because we allow and protect religious freedom and equal rights for all citizens. This is why people come to this country, for true freedom. We are a secular nation; therefore no government can prohibit rights based on religious beliefs.
It is obvious that as a U.S. citizen a person has the freedom to choose whether or not to participate in any religious system, so if a woman in the United States of Hindu religion chooses not to not marry a man who has been arranged by her family to marry, there is no legal consequences that will effect her freedom or rights. Although she may face problems within her family and faith, no one can force her into a marriage. She is still free to make her own choice, this includes marrying the person whom she has been arranged to marry.
To outlaw gay marriage, even if there seems to be a majority rule against it, would be unconstitutional. You would be taking a way an individual’s right to practice his or her own beliefs and choose to marry the person they wish to marry. It would be imposing on the same freedom that we say we try to protect in the United States . The constitution of the United States says that no State shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”
In my opinion, gay marriage does not hurt anyone. It may be offensive to some, but unless it is causing physical harm to someone, there is no justification for removing the right of marriage from anyone.
Also, where are these statistics coming from that say there is a majority that rules against gay marriage? Statistics cannot be accurate when they do not include studies across every city and town throughout the nation. I have never filled out a questionnaire that asked for my opinion, nor have I ever known someone who has filled out such a questionnaire. This proves that it is possible that there are many voters and citizens whose beliefs are not being accounted for. We should not be asking only the opinions of White Catholic Midwest middle-aged Americans for their opinions. The future of our nation is our children. We should be tapping into our high schools and colleges to see our future generations’ opinions for the importance of this and if their beliefs protect constitutional rights.
Personal belief systems are very complex. Our own beliefs are based on our background, religion, and upbringing, so we cannot expect that people’s views will change overnight. However, the tolerance of opposing views should be expected in this country, as our country was built by people who were seeking equality and freedom. There is no way to justify a ban on gay marriage because you are then saying it is okay to remove someone’s rights for equality and freedom.
In my opinion, if you are against gay marriage, then don’t marry a man if you’re a man, a woman if you’re a woman, and don’t attend a gay wedding. For all other purposes, people should keep their beliefs to themselves and stop imposing their beliefs as if they should be law. This is not Vatican City . Church and State are separate and always will be in the United States . We cannot call ourselves a secular nation if we allow states to prohibit personal freedoms based on religious beliefs.
Also, as a side note, I think the real problem lies in the fact that there is no sanctity of marriage anymore. Almost 49 % of marriages in the U.S. end in divorce. To me, the issue shouldn't be whether to allow gays to marry or not, but if anyone should be allowed to marry. Statistics show us that marriage already has troubles and so there would be no way to justify to me that gay marriage is going to have a negative impact on marriage as an establishment. Marriage has already been ruined by heterosexuals. Maybe we need gay couples to redeem its symbolism of love and commitment for us. If its worth saving than its worth allowing gays (who love each other just as much as any man or woman could love each other) to participate in its unity.